Required Reading: Inventing the AIDS Virus by Peter Duesberg

He predicted everything about the COVID "pandemic" with the way the AIDS story played out, almost 30 years ago

This is an incredibly wonderful book, about another tragic disease scourge, the AIDS epidemic, which I lived through as a physician in the 1980’s and which was, like COVID, a great source of fear, and which was, like COVID completely mishandled by our government /medical /scientific establishment.

For anyone who does not know, AIDS, Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, is a disorder which, in 2023 is STILL claimed, 40+ years after it was discovered, to be caused by the HIV (Himan ImmunoDeficiency) virus.

According the the CDC today, https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/whatishiv.html

• HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) is a virus that attacks the body’s immune system. If HIV is not treated, it can lead to AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome).

• There is currently no effective cure. Once people get HIV, they have it for life.

• But with proper medical care, HIV can be controlled. People with HIV who get effective HIV treatment can live long, healthy lives and protect their partners.

What Duesberg advances in this book is his Drug Theory of AIDS, which postulated that  the use of powerful drugs, such as those that were taken by sexually promiscuous gay men, like Amyl Nitrate, Cocaine, Heroin, Methampetamie, etc., caused a breakdown of the body’s immune system over time. This was exacerbated in the early days by drugs used for treatment, such as AZT, which caused the same wasting and loss of immune function that was being blamed on the disease.   What is interesting about this drug theory is that it predicts exactly what has been seen in the history of AIDS:

• It remains confined to a population that abuses drugs, or takes toxic therapeutics

• It has not crossed over into the heterosexual population as has every other sexually transmitted disease

• It has not crossed over into the female population of non drug users, as would be expected for a sexually transmitted disease.

• The incidence of positivity for the AIDS virus has remained constant in the population, and most people who test positive for the virus do very well without treatment if they have otherwise healthy lifestyles. A spreading disease would see increase in positivity in the population.

• The HIV virus is a retrovirus that is dormant after initial infection, since  antibodies are produced that clear the virus form the blood. It simply resides in the cell’s DNA, inactive. And in fact, the Virus does not become more numerous when the disease becomes apparent. This is unlike all viruses, which are noted at very high levels in the blood or mucus of infected ill individuals.

• People with aids who stop using drugs, including treatment drugs, get better.

Typically viruses cause disease that depends on the nature of a virus. Thus, Measles patients get a rash, mumps causes salivary gland swelling, Hepatitis B causes liver damage, and HPV causes warts. In contrast, HIV is said to cause any number of diseases. This is simply not in keeping with the nature of viruses. In addition, the diseases called under the heading of AIDS like Pneumocystic carinii pneumonia, and Kaposi’s sarcoma, and wasting syndrome, have been around long before AIDS. Strangely, these diseases are called AIDS if someone is HIV positive, and called by their regular name if someone is HIV negative. The following is circular reasoning: HIV causes AIDS. You have disease X. We assume that if you have disease X and are HIV positive, that HIV caused it. This last statement is dependent on the first statement= circular reasoning. Nothing has been proven.   

This Medical industrial complex that grew up around this so-called epidemic was dependent on the HIV cause narrative.

Studies of early drug therapy had short followup, poor blinding, early crossover treatment for those in the placebo group. All of these things obscured potential long term side effects of the treatment. SOUND LIKE COVID?

The early drugs were approved on a fast track, with less than regular testing. SOUND LIKE COVID?

People who died of the complications of their treatment have been labeled as dying from the disease. SOUND LIKE COVID?

Physicians and scientists with alternate theories of disease and treatment were denied research funding, frequently totally prevented from publishing. If they got a letter to the editor in, it would not be without establishment rebuttal articles right alongside. These scientists were shunned from presenting at scientific meetings, keeping the rest of the scientists in the narrative “bubble”. SOUND LIKE COVID?

Billions of dollars of research later, there is no cure, no effective vaccine, just calls by the scientific establishment for more money for more research (as long as that research fits the HIV virus causes AIDS hypothesis). SOUND LIKE COVID?

Read this book. Recommend it to others. Duesberg’s argument for his theory is convincing. Beyond that, Duesberg does a great job showing how government funding of scientific research and the peer review process, and the commercialization of science can lead to the destruction of the process by which science finds truth.

 It seems that we have not learned from our history, so they did it again. They will keep doing it. Repeat after me: THERE ARE NO PANDEMICS. THEY WILL TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR FEAR. THE TREATMENT IS WORSE THAN THE DISEASE.